Post-apocalypses

I’ve written before about the way movies about the middle ages tend to present the era as one of just fundamental lawlessness, when individual might was the thing that mattered most. And, of course, that’s pretty much nonsense. The early middle ages — and you could probably generalise this to periods of lawlessness generally — was a time when people thought very much in terms of collective identity and regarded the possibility of destabilising violence as something very real and very, very dangerous. There’s a lot of caution and compromise going around.

But, of course, people who make movies about the early middle ages aren’t really making movies about the early middle ages, they’re making movies about primal humanity, and in their minds, primal humanity is brutal and rapey rather than clannish and, er, well, rapey-but-in-a-less-obvious-more-insidious-way.

I was just thinking about this in the context of post-apocalyptic narratives, your Mad Maxes and so forth. Like the typical Viking movie, most of these are individualistic narratives (although, stick a pin in this, they’re often about characters who are individualists against a tribalist backdrop), and they tend to feature groups that are largely composed of BDSM bandits rather than, say, Amishy farmers. They have a lot in common with the stories we tell about the early middle ages, which makes sense because in a lot of ways you can consider that era a post-apocalyptic one.

But if we can think about the early middle ages (and lots of other periods in history) as post-apocalyptic, you’d think that we would then conclude that we can come to some conclusions about what post-apocalyptic societies would be like by looking at the history of the early middle ages. Instead, we seem to be mainly basing our sense of the early middle ages on stock “uncivilised” narratives.

I wonder if this is something to do with people’s unwilling to acknowledge that hardworking communities of farmers and what have you are actually not such great guys on the whole. They have form in terms of organised violence against other communities, not respecting people’s autonomy, the whole bit. The Magnificent Seven notwithstanding, it’s the farmers you want to look out for. Those guys are mean.

Advertisements
Post-apocalypses

2 thoughts on “Post-apocalypses

  1. Well, the poor Middle Ages also get a generally bad rap. The hipsters of the Renaissance wanted to cast previous centuries as ages of darkness and ignorance, the propagandists of the Reformation wanted to do the same, ditto the Enlightenment. And so on up to the present, when we still look down on them for not having this week’s approved attitudes about things.

    Consequently, when anyone in the past five hundred years has wanted to show an age of brutality and ignorance, the Middle Ages get pulled off the bench and sent in to take a dive in front of the crowd.

    (By the way, I’m a big fan of your Pledge Break podcast and the videos you’ve been doing!)

    1. Yeah, I agree about the later bias, but I also think that modern storytellers are just looking for reasons to cast historical periods as reflections of “human nature,” which is not otherwise in evidence. I like the image of taking a dive!

      And thanks for the kind words! I wish we could put Pledge Break out more often, but it’s hard with our schedules.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s