Movie Monday: The Eagle (2011)

I actually forgot that today I was going fire up the old Netflix and take in a historical film — blame it on the fact that it’s a holiday and therefore doesn’t feel like a Monday, maybe? So instead I thought I would talk about one I saw relatively recently, 2011’s The Eagle

Now, most criticism of this film has focused on two key points: first, it isn’t very faithful to the novel, and second, it isn’t very good. 

But what I actually want to talk about today is the portrayal of the Picts in the film. In the movie, our hero travels north to find the lost Eagle of his father’s legion. He runs into some Picts, or “seal people,” as they’re called. They might not even be Picts, but what else they might be I don’t know. Britons of some kind, I guess.

Or maybe post-apocalyptic Inuit mud men. Observe:

Image

Judge for yourself.

Now, I do not know what motivated the director to make these choices, but I have a theory, and I like it a little. Consider, if you will, Kingdom of Heaven. In that film, Ridley Scott exaggerated how well Christians and Muslims in the Crusader kingdoms got on during the period he was covering. His argument was that he needed to portray that the level of trust between the two groups was highly unusual — that the low-level squabbling of the period would have been as shocking to contemporary observers as full-on peace is to modern viewers. You can also see this in The Tudors, where the costume designers put Henry VIII in clothes that say “sexy athletic guy” to modern viewers, because the clothes that said “sexy athletic guy” to the Tudors would look crazy to us. 

Now, again, I’m of two minds. On the one hand it’s fucked up. Here’s a little more of a reconstruction, although it’s a wee bit later. 

Image

So maybe the director is trying to make some kind of weird meta-point, or maybe on the other hand he’s just being a lame-o and covering shit with mud and skulls because he’s a lazy person who loves the familiar exotic. 

But on the other other hand, fucking around with the representation of the Picts and turning them into fantasy animals is a grand old tradition. Check this bad boy out: 

Image

 

And what’s interesting is that that weird fantastic Pict commentary was intended to be compared to Native Americans, with the purpose of indicating to European readers that Native Americans were similar to Picts — while here we have Native Americans being used as the comparison to help the viewer understand Picts. 

Advertisements
Movie Monday: The Eagle (2011)

4 thoughts on “Movie Monday: The Eagle (2011)

  1. Brent says:

    A warning label on a product will explain it better… “Not intended for the other use.” The old tropes are still alive today, portraying Picts and Native Americans as “The OTHER people”, almost savages as you wish. But any sane person would act savage if their land was being taken over by Romans or Europeans….

    1. Hi Zachary,

      Thanks for stopping by! Your comment sounds like you’re disagreeing, but yeah, that’s pretty much what I think too. I was just pointing out that representing Picts as a weird other to make a point about relations between colonising and colonised peoples is an old artistic tradition, even if obviously it doesn’t have any roots in the archaeological reality.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s